DOI: 10.15293/1812-9463.2402.08
Anna S. Pirogova
Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
Elena N. Arbuzova
Omsk State University named after F. M. Dostoevsky, Omsk, Russia
Maria D. Yakovleva
Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
Vitalina I. Loshenko
Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
Aleksandr A. Makeev
Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
Andrey V. Sakharov
Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
Annotation. Introduction. The article discusses the issues of one of the most difficult topics in teaching biology at school and university. The aim of the work was to determine the reasons for the low level of assimilation of educational material related to the study of the topic “Energy metabolism”. Methodology. The authors analyzed the content of school biology textbooks of different authors for their scientific component, unity of theory and practice, accessibility and visibility, systematic and consistent presentation of material devoted to the study of energy metabolism. Results. The results of the study showed that one of the reasons for the complexity of learning the topic “Energy metabolism” may lay not in the subject area, but in the specifics of the methodology of teaching biology in general education organizations. In the conditions of the pedagogical experiment the results were obtained, which allow us to evaluate the methodology of teaching biology proposed by teachers of the pedagogical university when studying the topic “Energy metabolism”. Conclusion. From the position of teaching biological disciplines in the “school – university” system, a view on the need to develop educational and methodological support for the educational activity of general educational organizations is presented. It should be based on the application of immersive technologies of augmented, mixed and virtual reality, as well as the possibilities of the technopark of universal pedagogical competencies. It will be based on the leading principles and systems of “Theory and methods of teaching (education) of biology” as a pedagogical science.
Keywords: biology; selected topics; cytology; energy metabolism; biology teaching methodology; “school – university” system; technological park; biological education.
For Citation: Pirogova A. S., Arbuzova E. N., Yakovleva M. D., Loshenko V. I.,
Makeev A. A., Sakharov A. V. Prospects for the Functioning of the Technological Park of Universal Pedagogical Competencies in the Implementation of Educational Projects on the Example of Studying the Topic “Energy Exchange in a Cell”. Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 2024, no. 2 (74), pp. 87–101. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15293/1812-9463.2402.08
Funding. The work was carried out within the framework of applied scientific research by the federal state budgetary educational institution of higher education “Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University” on the theme “Designing a functional model of integration in the system “school-university” based on the use of Technopark resources in the realization of modern biological education” under the state assignment of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation for 2024 № 073-03-2024-052 from 18.01.2024.
References
1. Arbuzova E. N., Loshenko V. I., Oparin R. V., Sakharov A. V. Methodology of teaching biology. For training of personnel of higher qualification: textbook. Moscow: Yurait Publ., 2023, 201 p. (In Russian)
2. Arbuzova E. N., Yaskina O. A. Modern and promising technologies of teaching biology at school and university. Moscow: Flinta Publ., 2022, 207 p. (In Russian)
3. Babkin R. I., Arbuzova E. N. Model of interaction between high school and technopark of pedagogical university in the implementation of modern biological education. Biological Education: Traditions and Innovations: Proceedings of the I All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (Chelyabinsk, October 11–13, 2022). Under the scientific editorship of N. V. Efimova, M. V. Semenova. Chelyabinsk: Publishing House South Ural State Humanitarian and Pedagogical University, 2022, pp. 21–26. (In Russian)
4. Gritsay N. B. Methodological training of future biology teachers in the countries of Central and Southern Europe. Vector of Science of Togliatti State University. Series: Pedagogy, Psychology, 2015, no. 3 (22), pp. 51–56. (In Russian)
5. Kazakova N. O., Davletova Ch. S., Zholdoshbek K. A. The role of biology textbook at school in the formation of key competencies. Science, new technologies and innovations of Kyrgyzstan, 2023, no. 1, pp. 173–177. (In Russian)
6. Saraeva D. V., Arbuzova E. N. Formation of natural-scientific literacy in biological education with the help of immersive educational technologies. Bulletin of M. Akmulla Bashkir State Pedagogical University, 2022, no. 1-4 (62), pp. 54–57. (In Russian)
7. Saraeva D. V., Loshenko V. I., Sakharov A. V., Kandalintseva N. V. Support of teachers of natural science cycle in the organization of project and research activities of students of general education school: a methodical manual. Novosibirsk: Publishing house of Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, 2021, 99 p. (In Russian)
8. Sakharov A. V., Mishutina O. V., Arbuzova E. N., Loshenko V. I. Technopark as a resource center of interactive cooperation between school and pedagogical university in the implementation of modern biological education on an integrative basis. Biological and environmental education of students and schoolchildren: challenges of time and prospects for development: proceedings of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 90th anniversary of Professor V. I. Matveev (Samara, February 9–10, 2024). Edited by A. A. Semenov. Samara: Publishing house of Samara State Socio-Pedagogical University, 2024, pp. 35–39. (In Russian)
9. Sumatokhin S. V. Biology in the updated FSES of the basic general. Biology in school, 2021, no. 7, pp. 9–14. (In Russian)
10. Khaibulina K. V. Realization of updated FSES BGE in the work of a biology teacher. Biology in school, 2023, no. 1, pp. 18–27. (In Russian)
11. Abdulrahaman M. D., Faruk N., Oloyede A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde N. T.,
Olawoyin L. A., Mejabi O. V., Imam-Fulani Y. O., Fahm A. O., Azeez A. L. Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 2020, vol. 6, issue 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
12. Coley J. D., Arenson M., Xu Y., Tanner K. D. Intuitive biological thought: Developmental changes and effects of biology education in late adolescence. Cognitive Psychology, 2017, vol. 92, pp. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.11.001
13. Murniza M., Halimah B. Z., Azlina A. Virtual Biology Laboratory (VLab-Bio): Scenario-Based Learning Approach. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, vol. 69, pp. 162–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.395
14. Suciu A., Buruiană A., Repanovici A., Cotoros D., Bou S. F. Pedagogical Methods for Teaching the Use of Prototyping by 3D Printers. Procedia Manufacturing, 2019, vol. 32, pp. 356–359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.225
15. Sumatokhin S. V., Kalinova G. S. Biology Studies in Russian Schools. Journal of Subject Didactics, 2016, vol. 1, issue 2, pp. 127–132. DOI: https://doi.org//10.5281/zenodo.438179
16. Vorontsov A., Vorontsova E. Current Trends in Russian Scientific and Educational Development in the Context of Worldwide Globalization. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 214, pp. 1156–1164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.733
Information about the Authors
Anna S. Pirogova – Teacher of Biology, Secondary school no. 43; Postgraduate of the Department of Biology and Ecology Department, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russia, https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8441-881X, a_s_pirogova@mail.ru
Elena N. Arbuzova – Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Adaptive and Physical Education, Dostoevsky Omsk State University, Omsk, Russia, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6060-3896, arbuzova-elena@mail.ru
Maria D. Yakovleva – Junior Researcher of the Department of Biology and Ecology, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russia, https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5884-2061, mashayakovleva312001@gmail.com
Vitalina I. Loshenko – Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Biology and Ecology, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russia, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7137-2424, vitalina_loshenk@mail.ru
Aleksandr A. Makeev – Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Biology and Ecology, Vice Rector for Academic Affairs, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russia, https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1636-1859, prorector_educat@nspu.ru
Andrey V. Sakharov – Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Biology and Ecology, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russia, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5076-2113, asakharov142@yandex.ru
Authorsʼ contribution: Authors have all made an equivalent contribution to preparing the article for publication.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Received: 26.03.2024; approved after peer review: 20.04.2024; accepted for publication: 30.04.2024.
