Development of creative thinking in the process of project activity in the conditions of digital transformation of technological education

Original article

doi: 10.15293/1812-9463.2104.07

DEVELOPMENT OF CREATIVE THINKING IN THE PROCESS OF PROJECT ACTIVITY IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION

 

Valery V.  Krasheninnikov

Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6470-8145, E-mail: vkrash48@mail.ru

Irina I. Nekrasova

“Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University”, Novosibirsk. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0480-1238, e-mail: irinanekrasova@mail.ru.

  

The article considers the peculiarity of the development of student’s creative thinking in educational project activities in the learning process in the context of the digital technologies use in technological education. The main basic principles of the development of the subject area “Technology” as the most important element of mastering the competencies and skills of the XXI century are analyzed, taking into account the need to use modern digital technologies in the process of project activity, as a fundamental direction of mastering new knowledge in an intensively developing world. Based on the analysis of research by domestic and foreign scientists, it is shown that educational project activities contribute to the development of creative thinking when conditions are met that is close to the real design process. Some possible options for the implementation of educational project activities in modern conditions of digital transformation of technological education are described. The measures to solve the problems of modern technological education, contributing to the qualitative organization of the educational process, which relate to both the creation of pedagogical conditions and the corresponding material and technical base, are noted.

Keywords: technological education, digital technologies, project activity, creative thinking, digital transformation.

Funding: The research was carried out with the financial support of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation within a framework realizing of State Assignment No.073-00072-21-01 under the project “Digital transformation of education: development, testing of models for the implementation of distance learning in educational institutions of all levels of education”

Text

For Citation: Krasheninnikov V. V., Nekrasova I. I. Development of creative thinking in the process of project activity in the conditions of digital transformation of technological education // Journal of Pedagogical Innovations. 2021;(4):66–75. (in Russ.).

 

References

  1. Kamenev R. V., Volchek M. G., Nekrasova I. I. Technology teacher training and topical problems of modern technological education. World of Science, 2020. No, 4. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://mir-nauki.com/11pdmn420.html (date accessed: 09/30/2021/ (In Russian)
  2. Kaunov A. M. Development of the creative potential of students using digital information and logical models in project learning. Bulletin of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University. Pedagogical sciences. Volgograd, 2020, pp. 36– (In Russian)
  3. The concept of teaching the subject area “Technology” in educational organizations of the Russian Federation, implementing the main educational programs [Electronic resource]. URL: https://docs.edu.gov.ru/document/c4d7feb359d9563f114aea8106c9a2aa (date accessed: 08/28/2021)/ (In Russian)
  4. Kosogorova L. A., Krutikov V. K. Project activities at school: problems and prospects. Modern scientist, No. 4, 2021, pp. 64–68. (In Russian)
  5. Lazarev VS Project activity of students as a form of developing education Psychological science and education, 2015, vol. 20, No. 3. (In Russian)
  6. Malysheva N. V. Project method of teaching and project thinking of a teacher: search for new approaches. Professional education in Russia and abroad, 2019, No. 1 (33), pp. 48– (In Russian)
  7. National technological initiative [Electronic resource]. URL: https://nti2035.ru/nti/ (date accessed: 08/30/2021). (In Russian)
  8. Nekrasova I. I. The relationship of general and professional education in the formation of the cognitive activity of students, Dis … cand. ped. sciences. 13.00.08 / Omsk. 2004 229 p. (In Russian)
  9. Asha V., Devi V., Raghavendra R., Rachel A. R., Vinod P. & Sharmila T. Curricular impact on learning approaches and critical thinking skills of medical students. Education in Medicine Journal, 2016, vol. 8 (4), pp. 39–45.
  10. Broman K., Bernholf S. & Parchmann I. Analysing task design and students’ responses to context-based problems through different analytical frameworks. Research in Science & Technological Education, 2015, vol. 33 (2), pp. 143–161.
  11. Bagarukayo E., Weide Th P. van der, Mbarika V. W., & Kim M. S. The impact of learning driven constructs on the perceived higher order cognitive skills improvement: Multimedia vs. text. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 2012, vol. 8 (2), pp. 120–130.
  12. Coller B., & Scott M. Effectiveness of using a video game to teach a course in mechanical engineering. Computers and Education, 2009, vol. 53 (3), pp. 900–912;
  13. Hemmi A., Bayne  S. & Land R. The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2009, vol. 25 (1), pp. 19–30.
  14. Kirkwood A., & Price L. Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 2014, vol. 39 (1), pp. 6–36.
  15. James R., McInnis C. & Devlin M. Assessing learning in Australian universities. VIC, Australia: The University of Melbourne. 2012.
  16. Lee J., Cho H. What affects learner’s higher-order thinking in technology enhanced learning environments? The effects of learner factors. Computers & Education Computers & Education vol. 115. pp.143–152.
  17. Law N., Niederhauser D. S., Christensen R., & Shear L. A multilevel system of quality technology-enhanced learning and teaching indicators. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 2016, 19 (3), pp. 72–83.
  18. Lee J., Lim C. & Kim H. Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2017, 65 (2), pp. 427–453.